Global Financial Strategy

Search the site   >>Advanced search
First for financial regulatory news and views
HOME   |   REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   NEWS   |   ANALYSIS   |   INTERVIEWS & FEATURES   |   EVENTS   |   MUTTERS   |   JOBS   |   MY ACCOUNT
EUROPE   |    US & CANADA   |    ASIA PACIFIC   |    MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA   |    LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN   |    OFFSHORE   |    SINGAPORE   |    HONG KONG
TRADING   |    CASINO MARKET   |    BANKING   |    INSURANCE   |    FINANCIAL REPORTING   |    TAXATION   |    MACROECONOMIC   |    PROFILES   |   CONTACT   |   
  • MF Global spoke of 'strong' finances
  • EC: No corp gov powers for ESAs
  • FSA appoints senior investment bank adviser
  • GFS has now closed
  • Czechs join UK on fiscal compact sidelines
  • Davos stalemate on EU's IMF funds
  • Tucker: Resolution regime 'top priority'
  • Saudi Arabia increases central bank role
  • FSB urges Canada for one securities regulator
  • CFTC set for committee to scrutinise HFT
  • Fitch downgrades Belgian banks
  • What corruption really costs
  • UK FSA pushes for Mifid II rethink on OTCs
  • Shanghai boosts global financial status
  • Canada aligns credit rating rules with EU
  • Bowles blasts lack of women at ECB
  • Sarkozy to introduce French FTT in August
  • Barnier warns on further bonus reforms
GFS LinkedIn
GFS Facebook
GFS Twitter
GFS RSS feed
You must be logged in to use this function.


What corruption really costs

Monday 30 January 2012 – by Heidi Lawson


Heidi Lawson, partner at Chadbourne & Parke LLP, looks at the impact of compliance and corruption on a company’s value.

When you mention the word “compliance” to almost anyone working in capital markets, be they bankers, lawyers or accountants, you almost immediately lose your audience.

Compliance is just a cost centre, right? Just another legal hurdle in the way of getting deals done efficiently, right?

Wrong! In the new era of compliance-hungry regulators, who are fighting corruption “Superman” style, it pays to put these issues at the forefront of every deal.

The global focus on corruption shows no signs of abating, and in fact, is intensifying. There are increasingly large penalties, jail sentences and demands on the board of directors for even stricter corporate governance and compliance programs.

The most common and effective tools for exacting punishment are the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the new UK Bribery Act. However, some of the penalties and jail sentences are arguably pale in comparison to the impact on company value.

Related articles:
Libya’s shadow on sovereign wealth funds
Roubini: The instability of inequality
Indian anti-corruption chief forced out
Croatia ‘could join EU in January 2013’
Russia falls foul in worldwide corruption rankings

Impact on Price

FCPA and Bribery Act investigations can have an immediate impact on share price. For example, on March 1, 2011, the Las Vegas Sands Corporation announced that the Securities and Exchange Commission and the DOJ were investigating its FCPA compliance.

By the end of the trading day, its share price had dropped 6.3 per cent, which represented a shrink in market capitalisation of $1.67bn in a single day.

Examples of this kind, showing a marked drop in share price and value in response to announcements of alleged corruption, are common.

FCPA fines are steep and on the increase. In 2010, companies paid in penalties an average of $2.14 per U.S. dollar gained from FCPA violations. This is an 1,800 per cent increase from penalties of just $0.11 per dollar in 2007.

In 2010, corporate fines and disgorgements for FCPA violations amounted to over $1.7bn, which exceeded all previous years. And, the six largest actions in 2010 accounted for $1.36bn of this total.

There are also significant “downstream effects” that can far surpass the cost to companies of FCPA fines and drops in share price. These include securities class action lawsuits, disbarment from foreign contracts and restrictions on the ability to import or export goods and services.


Article pages: |   1  |  2  |  3  |



WHAT DO YOU THINK?
 
Name:
   
Email:
   
Comment:
   
Post as Anonymous
  Display name
   
Please, enter security code
   
 

No comments yet.
Login Register Most read Most commented
Username

Password

>> Forgotten your password?
>> Sign Up  

GFS is pleased to offer you a two-week free trial. You will receive a daily email bulletin of the latest regulatory news and analysis and a weekly email round-up. Please complete the free trial form. You will also receive full access to our online site.

EDITOR’S CHOICE

  • Diamond warns against ‘Balkanisation’
  • ABI: UK insurers must keep EU links
  • EU Parliament site hit by hacktivists
  • George Soros: New year, same crisis
  • FSB: Swiss regulator needs more teeth
  • OCC: Deriv fears are an overreaction
  • ‘Major wave’ of Solvency II drafts in May
  • IMF paper urges Aus bank capital boost
  • BoE: Limit bonuses to boost bank capital
  • 2012 vision: Increased regulatory exposure looms
  • Barnier offers hope to NYSE/Boerse
  • Esma rushes short selling consultation
  • Bowles re-elected as Econ chair
  • Hoogervorst hints at accounting slowdown
  • Asia in the year of the dragon
  • Barnier: FTT will not be forced on UK
INTERVIEWS & FEATURES

STRAW POLL

Will markets in 2012 have a tougher time than 2011?

Yes

No

Don’t know

View results

FIND A REGION world regions
 
Global Financial Strategy - [email protected] | Home | Legal | Contact design by SDV