Global Financial Strategy

Search the site   >>Advanced search
First for financial regulatory news and views
HOME   |   REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   NEWS   |   ANALYSIS   |   INTERVIEWS & FEATURES   |   EVENTS   |   MUTTERS   |   JOBS   |   MY ACCOUNT
EUROPE   |    US & CANADA   |    ASIA PACIFIC   |    MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA   |    LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN   |    OFFSHORE   |    SINGAPORE   |    HONG KONG
TRADING   |    CASINO MARKET   |    BANKING   |    INSURANCE   |    FINANCIAL REPORTING   |    TAXATION   |    MACROECONOMIC   |    PROFILES   |   CONTACT   |   
  • MF Global spoke of 'strong' finances
  • EC: No corp gov powers for ESAs
  • FSA appoints senior investment bank adviser
  • GFS has now closed
  • Czechs join UK on fiscal compact sidelines
  • Davos stalemate on EU's IMF funds
  • Tucker: Resolution regime 'top priority'
  • Saudi Arabia increases central bank role
  • FSB urges Canada for one securities regulator
  • CFTC set for committee to scrutinise HFT
  • Fitch downgrades Belgian banks
  • What corruption really costs
  • UK FSA pushes for Mifid II rethink on OTCs
  • Shanghai boosts global financial status
  • Canada aligns credit rating rules with EU
  • Bowles blasts lack of women at ECB
  • Sarkozy to introduce French FTT in August
  • Barnier warns on further bonus reforms
GFS LinkedIn
GFS Facebook
GFS Twitter
GFS RSS feed
You must be logged in to use this function.


‘Gaps’ in central bank stability reports – IMF paper

Tuesday 10 January 2012 – by Karina Whalley


International Monetary Fund economists have found holes in the financial stability reports produced by central banks which they criticised for being “less capable of assessing systemic risk”.

In a working paper released on Monday, it said that the reports need to take more forward-looking perspectives as well as a better view of financial interconnections in order to evaluate systemic risk accurately.

“Our analysis suggests that the FSRs, despite some improvements in recent years, still tend to leave much to be desired in terms of their clarity, coverage of key risks, and consistency over time,” the paper said.

“A major drawback of a number of FSRs is the lack of ‘forward-lookingness’ of the reports – that is, insufficient analysis of risks and vulnerabilities – making them less capable of assessing systemic risk,” it said.

FSRs aim to limit financial instability by pointing out key risks and vulnerabilities to policymakers, market participants and the public and as of 2011, around 80 central banks now issue these reports, according to the study.

The paper focused on financial stability reporting in eight countries: Brazil, Canada, Korea, Iceland, Latvia, New Zealand, South Africa and Spain.

Related articles:
IMF stress tests Japanese banks
ESRB: National powers for systemic risk
EU insurers to file stability reports
Securities regs must identify systemic risk
EU’s ‘inadequate reforms’ risk to stability

It found that the bulk of analyses and discussions of systemic risks tends to rely on the current levels of ratios as well as on the underlying factors behind past developments in the financial system, the paper said.

But the FSRs seldom include statements, assessments or even survey results that are indicative of what is to be expected in the near term. New Zealand and Korea were found to be the most forward-looking.

The study’s authors were concerned that none of the reviewed reports included an analysis of linkages or exposures among domestic banks or showed any information on systemically important financial institutions or financial conglomerates.

They also said that an analysis of the interconnectedness of banks in different countries was not reported on a regular basis in the examined FSRs.

“There is no regular analysis or explanation of cross-border banking linkages in the FSRs,” the study warned.

“More importantly, no analysis of sovereign exposures of the banking system is reported in the FSRs.”


Article pages: |   1  |  2  |



WHAT DO YOU THINK?
 
Name:
   
Email:
   
Comment:
   
Post as Anonymous
  Display name
   
Please, enter security code
   
 

No comments yet.
Login Register Most read Most commented
Username

Password

>> Forgotten your password?
>> Sign Up  

GFS is pleased to offer you a two-week free trial. You will receive a daily email bulletin of the latest regulatory news and analysis and a weekly email round-up. Please complete the free trial form. You will also receive full access to our online site.

EDITOR’S CHOICE

  • Diamond warns against ‘Balkanisation’
  • ABI: UK insurers must keep EU links
  • EU Parliament site hit by hacktivists
  • George Soros: New year, same crisis
  • FSB: Swiss regulator needs more teeth
  • OCC: Deriv fears are an overreaction
  • ‘Major wave’ of Solvency II drafts in May
  • IMF paper urges Aus bank capital boost
  • BoE: Limit bonuses to boost bank capital
  • 2012 vision: Increased regulatory exposure looms
  • Barnier offers hope to NYSE/Boerse
  • Esma rushes short selling consultation
  • Bowles re-elected as Econ chair
  • Hoogervorst hints at accounting slowdown
  • Asia in the year of the dragon
  • Barnier: FTT will not be forced on UK
INTERVIEWS & FEATURES

STRAW POLL

Will markets in 2012 have a tougher time than 2011?

Yes

No

Don’t know

View results

FIND A REGION
 
Global Financial Strategy - [email protected] | Home | Legal | Contact design by SDV