Global Financial Strategy

Search the site   >>Advanced search
First for financial regulatory news and views
HOME   |   REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   NEWS   |   ANALYSIS   |   INTERVIEWS & FEATURES   |   EVENTS   |   MUTTERS   |   JOBS   |   MY ACCOUNT
EUROPE   |    US & CANADA   |    ASIA PACIFIC   |    MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA   |    LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN   |    OFFSHORE   |    SINGAPORE   |    HONG KONG
TRADING   |    CASINO MARKET   |    BANKING   |    INSURANCE   |    FINANCIAL REPORTING   |    TAXATION   |    MACROECONOMIC   |    PROFILES   |   CONTACT   |   
  • MF Global spoke of 'strong' finances
  • EC: No corp gov powers for ESAs
  • FSA appoints senior investment bank adviser
  • GFS has now closed
  • Czechs join UK on fiscal compact sidelines
  • Davos stalemate on EU's IMF funds
  • Tucker: Resolution regime 'top priority'
  • Saudi Arabia increases central bank role
  • FSB urges Canada for one securities regulator
  • CFTC set for committee to scrutinise HFT
  • Fitch downgrades Belgian banks
  • What corruption really costs
  • UK FSA pushes for Mifid II rethink on OTCs
  • Shanghai boosts global financial status
  • Canada aligns credit rating rules with EU
  • Bowles blasts lack of women at ECB
  • Sarkozy to introduce French FTT in August
  • Barnier warns on further bonus reforms
GFS LinkedIn
GFS Facebook
GFS Twitter
GFS RSS feed
You must be logged in to use this function.


S&P; threatens EU bailout fund downgrade

Tuesday 6 December 2011 – by [email protected]


The European bailout fund’s triple-A credit rating has been placed on negative watch by Standard & Poor’s, meaning it faces at least a 50 per cent chance of being downgraded in the next three months.

The move has been prompted by S&P;’s downgrade threat to 15 of the 17 eurozone member states late on Monday, as six of the AAA rated sovereigns guarantee the financial obligations of the European Financial Stability Facility.

On Tuesday afternoon, the rating agency said that depending on the outcome of its review of the ratings on EFSF member governments, it could lower the long-term rating on the EFSF “by one or two notches”.

It said: “A credit watch negative placement indicates that, in our opinion, there is at least a one-in-two probability of the rating being lowered in the short term.

“Based on EFSF’s current structure, were we to lower one or more of the current AAA ratings on EFSF’s guarantor members, all else being equal, we would lower the issuer and issue ratings on EFSF to the lowest sovereign rating on members currently rated AAA.”

Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Luxembourg and the Netherlands are the EFSF guarantor members holding a triple A status that were put on negative credit watch on Monday.

Related articles:
EU falls short on boosting EFSF fund
Draghi demands answers on EFSF delay
S&P; affirms AAA for expanded EFSF
No such thing as EFSF leverage without ECB
Slovakia agrees on EFSF changes

But S&P; caveats: “We could also affirm the ratings [of EFSF] if we were to lower the current AAA ratings on one or more guarantor members, but had evidence that the EFSF guarantor members were implementing further credit enhancements that were in our view sufficient to mitigate the relevant guarantor members’ reduced creditworthiness.”

It adds: “We expect to resolve EFSF’s credit watch placement within 90 days and, if possible sooner, after we complete the review of EFSF guarantor members currently rated AAA.”

Commenting on this in light of the European Commission’s recent proposals to clamp down on rating agencies, internal market commissioner Michel Barnier said: “I don’t think agencies are taking revenge on our proposals. I can’t imagine that. Frankly, no.

“But all financial players, including rating agencies, must understand that they will be subject to public regulation carried out in the most intelligent and effective way possible.

“I’m not jumping to conclusions. I am not starting an ideological fight. All financial actors serve a purpose. Some have more weight than others. I have often said that private agencies whose actions affect the public, warrant public supervision, perhaps more than others.”

Send us your thoughts (in strict confidence) or submit an article in response:
Email: [email protected]




WHAT DO YOU THINK?
 
Name:
   
Email:
   
Comment:
   
Post as Anonymous
  Display name
   
Please, enter security code
   
 

No comments yet.
Login Register Most read Most commented
Username

Password

>> Forgotten your password?
>> Sign Up  

GFS is pleased to offer you a two-week free trial. You will receive a daily email bulletin of the latest regulatory news and analysis and a weekly email round-up. Please complete the free trial form. You will also receive full access to our online site.

EDITOR’S CHOICE

  • Diamond warns against ‘Balkanisation’
  • ABI: UK insurers must keep EU links
  • EU Parliament site hit by hacktivists
  • George Soros: New year, same crisis
  • FSB: Swiss regulator needs more teeth
  • OCC: Deriv fears are an overreaction
  • ‘Major wave’ of Solvency II drafts in May
  • IMF paper urges Aus bank capital boost
  • BoE: Limit bonuses to boost bank capital
  • 2012 vision: Increased regulatory exposure looms
  • Barnier offers hope to NYSE/Boerse
  • Esma rushes short selling consultation
  • Bowles re-elected as Econ chair
  • Hoogervorst hints at accounting slowdown
  • Asia in the year of the dragon
  • Barnier: FTT will not be forced on UK
INTERVIEWS & FEATURES

STRAW POLL

Will markets in 2012 have a tougher time than 2011?

Yes

No

Don’t know

View results

FIND A REGION world regions
 
Global Financial Strategy - [email protected] | Home | Legal | Contact design by SDV