Global Financial Strategy

Search the site   >>Advanced search
First for financial regulatory news and views
HOME   |   REGISTER   |   SUBSCRIBE   |   NEWS   |   ANALYSIS   |   INTERVIEWS & FEATURES   |   EVENTS   |   MUTTERS   |   JOBS   |   MY ACCOUNT
EUROPE   |    US & CANADA   |    ASIA PACIFIC   |    MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA   |    LATIN AMERICA & CARIBBEAN   |    OFFSHORE   |    SINGAPORE   |    HONG KONG
TRADING   |    CASINO MARKET   |    BANKING   |    INSURANCE   |    FINANCIAL REPORTING   |    TAXATION   |    MACROECONOMIC   |    PROFILES   |   CONTACT   |   
  • MF Global spoke of 'strong' finances
  • EC: No corp gov powers for ESAs
  • FSA appoints senior investment bank adviser
  • GFS has now closed
  • Czechs join UK on fiscal compact sidelines
  • Davos stalemate on EU's IMF funds
  • Tucker: Resolution regime 'top priority'
  • Saudi Arabia increases central bank role
  • FSB urges Canada for one securities regulator
  • CFTC set for committee to scrutinise HFT
  • Fitch downgrades Belgian banks
  • What corruption really costs
  • UK FSA pushes for Mifid II rethink on OTCs
  • Shanghai boosts global financial status
  • Canada aligns credit rating rules with EU
  • Bowles blasts lack of women at ECB
  • Sarkozy to introduce French FTT in August
  • Barnier warns on further bonus reforms
GFS LinkedIn
GFS Facebook
GFS Twitter
GFS RSS feed
You must be logged in to use this function.


Does India need a sovereign wealth fund?

Thursday 24 November 2011 – by Kavaljit Singh


In a bid to emulate other BRIC nations India could be on the cusp of creating its own sovereign wealth fund. The idea has certainly gained traction with business and political leaders, says Kavaljit Singh, director of India’s Public Interest Research Centre.

New Delhi will soon take a final call on the issue of setting up of a sovereign wealth fund. The idea of setting up an Indian SWF has been going around since 2007 when China established its major sovereign wealth fund, China Investment Corporation, with an initial capital fund of $200bn.

However, this time the proposal has received strong support from India’s corporate leaders who recently suggested the establishment of a state-owned SWF primarily to secure access to natural resources and pursue strategic investment opportunities overseas.

With the strong backing of corporate leaders, a SWF may soon be a reality and India will join other BRIC nations having such a fund. Although the initial capital of the proposed fund is still under discussion, it is unlikely to exceed $10bn.

Despite the excitement in official circles, the necessary preconditions for establishing a sovereign fund are missing in India. It appears that New Delhi is blindly following a “me-too” approach rather than understanding the rationale behind setting up such funds.

The main policy rationale behind setting up a SWF is not to secure access to natural resources or acquire strategic assets abroad, as perceived by New Delhi. Such funds are established to manage excessive foreign exchange reserves, commodity exports, the proceeds of privatisations and fiscal surpluses. For instance, China established CIC to manage its excessive forex reserves, which reached $3.2tn by August 2011.

Related articles:
Libya’s shadow on sovereign wealth funds
Chinese govt increases stake in banks
Hedge fund ethics pushed in US and Asia
London king of sovereign wealth funds
Sovereign health

SWFs help in diversifying and improving the return on a country’s foreign exchange reserves or commodity revenues. Like central banks, SWFs deploy surplus forex reserves; but since SWFs are set up to diversify investment, they undertake long-term investments in illiquid and risky assets, whereas central banks typically undertake short-term investments in low-yielding liquid assets, such as government securities and money market instruments.

SWFs are typically patient investors with long-term investment horizons. Since they have no explicit liabilities, they can remain committed to their investments in the hope of booking higher returns in the future. Also their funding sources tend to be fairly stable, which makes them less sensitive to market volatility. Unlike hedge funds and private equity funds, SWFs are not prone to withdrawals by investors that could force them to liquidate their market positions quickly.


Article pages: |   1  |  2  |  3  |



WHAT DO YOU THINK?
 
Name:
   
Email:
   
Comment:
   
Post as Anonymous
  Display name
   
Please, enter security code
   
 

No comments yet.
Login Register Most read Most commented
Username

Password

>> Forgotten your password?
>> Sign Up  

GFS is pleased to offer you a two-week free trial. You will receive a daily email bulletin of the latest regulatory news and analysis and a weekly email round-up. Please complete the free trial form. You will also receive full access to our online site.

EDITOR’S CHOICE

  • Diamond warns against ‘Balkanisation’
  • ABI: UK insurers must keep EU links
  • EU Parliament site hit by hacktivists
  • George Soros: New year, same crisis
  • FSB: Swiss regulator needs more teeth
  • OCC: Deriv fears are an overreaction
  • ‘Major wave’ of Solvency II drafts in May
  • IMF paper urges Aus bank capital boost
  • BoE: Limit bonuses to boost bank capital
  • 2012 vision: Increased regulatory exposure looms
  • Barnier offers hope to NYSE/Boerse
  • Esma rushes short selling consultation
  • Bowles re-elected as Econ chair
  • Hoogervorst hints at accounting slowdown
  • Asia in the year of the dragon
  • Barnier: FTT will not be forced on UK
INTERVIEWS & FEATURES

STRAW POLL

Will markets in 2012 have a tougher time than 2011?

Yes

No

Don’t know

View results

FIND A REGION
 
Global Financial Strategy - [email protected] | Home | Legal | Contact design by SDV