GFS LinkedIn
GFS Facebook
GFS Twitter
GFS RSS feed

EU must endorse IFRS 9 standard, commentators urge

Wednesday 30 June 2010 - by Andy Hickley

Commentators have urged the European Union to endorse the IFRS9 accounting standard currently being finalised by the FASB and the IASB.

Speaking at an ACCA roundtable on 29 June in Brussels, ACCA head of financial reporting Richard Martin said that the standard needed to be approved by the EU so that other countries will not be able to gain a head start in using it.

He said: “One of the key things we are waiting for is for IFRS 9 to be endorsed by the EU. It is significant that banks and companies in other parts of the world will be able to use IFRS 9, but without endorsement we will not.

“We are arguing for IFRS 9, it is a significant improvement. Whilst not being simple, it is much simpler than the processes we have been using.”

Others at the roundtable, warned of the dangers of delaying implementation of the IFRS9 standard despite calling for changes to certain elements.



Barclays director of accounting policy Ben Binnington said that instability over aspects of the standard could slow down implementation.

“Not a lot is known about IFRS 9’s policy on hedging. We know IAS39 [the standard it is replacing] is too complex, and simplicity is a useful step. But the main issue is the delay.

“It seems sensible to us to adopt easier parts of the standard earlier. For example if you want to adopt the policy on liabilities then you have to adopt policies on impairment. We know the decision on impairment will probably be delayed, so if we want to make changes on liabilities then we may have to wait until around 2013.”

EFRAG Chair Francoise Flores said that IFRS 9 brings improvement in accounting for financial instruments.

She said: “It will bring more clarity, less diversity, and will maintain the mixed measurement model on financial reporting.

"The majority of shareholders have acknowledged improvement in the bill, though we know that some European constituents have significant concerns that the amortised cost category is too restrictive or that recycling of gains and losses upon disposal of equity instruments is prohibited.

"The second phase of developing IFRS 9 has revealed that a wide consensus that an incurred loss model must be replaced. We agree that fair value, or ‘through-the-cycle’ approaches would not be appropriate”.

Binnington agreed with replacing the current incurred loss model.

He said: “We’d like to have the ability to see losses and do something before one of the current IAS 39 triggers.”

Martin however said that he believed the current model to be “actually pretty good.”


WHAT DO YOU THINK?
 
Name:
   
Email:
   
Comment:
   
Post as Anonymous
  Display name
   
Please, enter security code
   
 

No comments yet.
INTERVIEWS & FEATURES
What corruption really costs
Heidi Lawson, partner at Chadbourne & Parke LLP, looks at the impact of compliance and corruption on a company's value.

STRAW POLL

Will markets in 2012 have a tougher time than 2011?

Yes

No

Don't know

View results

FIND A REGION world regions